PRINCIPLES · HUMAN DIRECTION
Know what you share, what others may do with it, and what changes when you change your mind.
You decide what is remembered
Demo · not saved
Imagine a future neighborhood filmmaking game. You tell your Spirit how a neighbor once helped you through a lonely evening. Later, a team wants to use that event in a short film. A possible paid release makes the question more consequential—not less personal.
Telling a companion is not permission to publish. These choices explore how the proposed game could respond; they do not describe an automatic feature in today’s Spirit.
Exploring: Keep the memory private
The team finds another scene. A useful contribution can be a refusal that keeps a person comfortable taking part. Your Spirit should not turn a private fact into shared material simply because it would improve the film.
Proposed next step: remove the personal reference from the working brief and ask the team for a different dramatic idea.
These are authored examples. Your choice stays on this page and resets on reload; it sends no contribution, stores no permission and instructs no Agent.
02 · AVAILABLE CONTROL · PERSONAL EXPLORER
A personal companion should begin with a deliberate choice about context. Today’s account experience supports one manually saved fact, not a running record of your life.
Register or sign in and open your personal Explorer’s Your saved fact control. It shows the account-confirmed fact or an empty state. After creating your Explorer, you can choose one fact of up to 240 characters. Chats are not saved automatically.
Choose Correct saved fact, review the old wording and confirm forgetting it. Then edit the unsaved draft and separately save the replacement. If you leave before saving, no fact remains saved. Personal spoken replies send the saved fact to OpenAI with request context.
Choose Delete saved fact and confirm, or cancel to keep it. A confirmed deletion stops adding this fact from saved memory to new replies. Saving or deleting resets this page’s temporary conversation; it does not clear other open sessions or recall previously sent information.
This control does not promise to erase copies elsewhere or data retained by a service provider. It does not delete an account, published work or another person’s records. Personal memory does not automatically transfer into the creative examples on this site.
Open personal memory controls · sign in ↗03 · PROPOSED SAFEGUARD · SHARED PROJECTS
A private recollection might become a script, a reviewed cut and eventually a public release. Each step changes who encounters it and what they can do with it. Joining a team would not be a blanket yes to every later use.
Identify the material and intended audience: a small review group or the public. Ask what can stay private, be fictionalized or be left out entirely.
A new edit, recognizable likeness, translation, promotional excerpt or proposed sale can introduce a new question. Check the agreed scope instead of treating earlier enthusiasm as approval.
Let the relevant people review the actual version and unresolved concerns. If permission is unclear, hold the affected material out of the release until the team resolves it.
04 · PROPOSED AGREEMENTS · CREATIVE VALUE
In the imagined film, one person writes the encounter, another designs the street, and a Spirit helps compare cuts. A useful record would explain who did what without pretending that a credit settles every right or commercial term.
| Keep distinct | What the team would agree |
|---|---|
| Contribution | Name the scene, draft or revision and the human direction behind any Agent assistance. Keep enough history to understand the work, with the contributor’s agreement about what is shared. |
| Credit | Agree names and disclose Spirit or Agent assistance. Credit does not grant reuse permission. |
| Rights & permission | Review source material and agree permitted uses and who can approve changes. This page issues no license. |
| Commercial terms | Before a paid release, settle distribution, costs and revenue terms. Credit does not guarantee income. |
Aura is a proposed value layer. It is not a live balance, money, ownership certificate or automatic right to revenue. The site currently provides illustrative production and release briefs, not payments or a rights registry.
05 · PROPOSED REVIEW · HUMAN DECISIONS
One editor wants the ending to feel hopeful; another thinks it hides the cost of the encounter. Review should make the difference understandable, rather than turning the loudest response into the only version.
Taste, a factual error and missing permission call for different responses. Discuss the scene or rule, rather than judging the person who raised the concern.
Keep both cuts readable. Ask what each makes the audience understand and what it leaves out. A Spirit could summarize trade-offs; people would choose under the team’s agreed review rules.
Record the agreed reason, unresolved concerns and who can revisit the decision. A separate story branch would still need permission for any material it carries forward.
06 · PROPOSED SAFEGUARD · CHANGING YOUR MIND
You should be able to stop taking part without the team guessing what happens next. Leaving the group, withdrawing future work and changing permissions on an existing release are different questions.
A proposed exit conversation would identify unfinished tasks, private material, access to working copies and how credits should appear. Agree what the team may retain or continue using; stop new assignments and hand over only what was agreed.
Discuss future editions, publicity and any continuing uses against the original agreement. Already distributed copies may remain. The project should explain what can change and what cannot, rather than promising to recall every copy.
These are future project safeguards, not a live membership or exit workflow. Deleting your personal Explorer’s saved fact is a separate control; it does not withdraw a film contribution or erase another person’s copy.